Organizations Today Own Various Programs †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Organizations Today Own Various Programs? Answer: Introducation Organizations today own various programs such as enterprise software, CRM, business intelligence solutions, office packages, web browsers, communication software, and operating systems. These products are either developed by an in-house team, purchased from a vendor, or outsourced from external developers. Copyright prevents other people from copying either part of all work subsisted by the copyright. Stakeholders are determined that copyright law should protect computer software. Unfortunately, even with the presence of the laws, courts and proprietors are struggling with the challenge of treating IT programs as part of authorship works. Additionally, there are new copyright uncertainties and issues concerning the protection scope of software applications and the legal procedure for infringement of digital works covered by copyrights. Furthermore, the wide use of the Internet caused by the creation of affordable interfaces and devices and acceleration of online solution has contribu ted to the issue of copyright laws in ICT. From the above analysis, companies dealing with computer programs should assess the current copyright protection and the way it has been devised to support the IT environment. The Copyright Amendment Act 2006 amended the Act of 1968. The Amendment Act was assented in December 2006 to put all its provision into force. The amendment act of 2006 introduced some reforms, such as the Copyright Tribunal, criminal penalties, technological protection measures, expectations allowing format and time shifting, and parody defense (Copyright Amendment Bill 2006). It is also important to note that the Copyright Amendment Act 2006 is also an improvement of the Copyright Amendment Act 2000 that focused on digital media. The objects of the previous Act was to amend the one of 1968 by ensuring that industries would operate efficiently in the online environment. The Act promoted the development and exploitation of copyright material in online technologies to improve financial rewards for vendors. Further, the Amendment Act of 2000 encouraged adoption of international technical standards to ensure that new IT trends such as the Internet use are protected (Copyright Amendment Act 2000). Organizations using computer programs should focus on the technological protection reforms introduced by the Copyright Amendment Act 2006. They include mechanisms copyright owners can adopt to protect unauthorized access and use of copyright content (access and copy-control TPMs). Notably, the Act sanctioned against creating or distributing services and tools that sidestep access and copy control protection measures (Passing of New Copyright Laws 2007). These TPMs offer extensive prevention that what Australia provided in the Act of 1968. In general, the new amendment Act is guided by the requirement of the law to remain relevant with dynamic developments in ICT and changing consumer behavior (Bond 2006, p. 6). There is a need for the law to be updated to keep up with software piracy issue while encouraging the development of markets for vendors. Further, Bond (2006) notes that under the Amendment Act, individuals are allowed to replicate media from one format to another for own use. This reform affects workers in an organization since it allows people to copy vendor material into another format for private use. For instance, accountants in finance department can copy a periodical of a book from another author and scan it for reading on a laptop or computer. Implementation and Adherence The Copyright Amendment Act 2006 should be understood together with its concepts for successful implementation. Firms should first consolidate the Act and amendments and its policies. Internal company policies should establish more realistic and faire use of copyrighted IT materials such as format, space, and time shifting to ensure that the company is not on the wrong side of the law. Adherence can be achieved through approving stringent punishment on any party, or employee, found using a software without a license from the vendor. Punishment should include penalties or suspension from work. Employees should also be trained and the firm should hire a person in charge of ensuring that the company is compliant. Recommendations Unfortunately, the existing Copyright Amendment Act 2006 does not outline clearly the policies to protect software program and adherence to the law. This paper recommends the extension of the law to focus on the distinctive issues that arise with the development and use of applications. In effect, all computer programs should be protected by the copyright. Further, a patent should protect the devices using the software. Further, the copyright protecting such software programs should be established globally and harmonized through an international treaties to ensure that the software is not replicated elsewhere without prior knowledge and authorization from the author. References Bond, C. (2006). More convenient copyright? The Copyright Amendment Act 2006. Journal for the Australian and New Zealand Societies, 66, 1-6. Copyright Amendment Bill 2006. (2006). The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/bill_em/cab2006223/memo_0.html Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000. (2000). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/au/au093en.pdf Passing of new copyright laws. (2007). Davis Collison Cave. Retrieved from https://www.davies.com.au/ip-news/passing-of-new-copyright-laws